archive-fr.com » FR » C » CNE-EVALUATION.FR

Total: 104

Choose link from "Titles, links and description words view":

Or switch to "Titles and links view".
  • Comité national d'évaluation de l'enseignement supérieur - CNÉ
    établissements publics à caractère scientifique culturel et professionnel Autorité administrative indépendante 43 rue de la procession entrée piétons 61 65 rue Dutot 75015 Paris France tél 33 0 1 55

    Original URL path: https://www.cne-evaluation.fr/ (2015-12-30)
    Open archived version from archive


  • CNE

    (No additional info available in detailed archive for this subpage)
    Original URL path: /fr/present/som_mis.htm (2015-12-30)


  • CNE

    (No additional info available in detailed archive for this subpage)
    Original URL path: /fr/actualite/som_actu.htm (2015-12-30)


  • CNE

    (No additional info available in detailed archive for this subpage)
    Original URL path: /fr/progra/som_guid.htm (2015-12-30)


  • CNE

    (No additional info available in detailed archive for this subpage)
    Original URL path: /fr/publication/som_publi.htm (2015-12-30)


  • CNE

    (No additional info available in detailed archive for this subpage)
    Original URL path: /fr/documentation/som_bul.htm (2015-12-30)


  • CNE

    (No additional info available in detailed archive for this subpage)
    Original URL path: /fr/autresites/index.htm (2015-12-30)


  • Présentation du CNE en langue anglaise
    regards a discipline geography information and communication studies chemistry or a type of degree course postgraduate degrees in medical studies pharmacy courses The CNE also focuses on the missions of the universities and examines the general higher education policy issues in its annual report to the President of the Republic The main characteristics of the evaluation as is carried out by the CNE are as follows the evaluation is based upon both quantitative and qualitative elements It gives importance to the context the specific situation the evolution and the particular objectives of the evaluated institution the evaluation includes an internal and an external phase The evaluated institution prepares an internal evaluation record with the help of some CNE s guidelines Handbook of Standards for Quality Management in French Higher Education Institutions This record analyses the institution strengths its weaknesses and its future prospects The external phase is a peer review consisting of a site visit and leading to confidential reports The CNE then bases itself upon both the internal evaluation and the experts reports to elaborate the evaluation report which is public the evaluation reports analyse the way the institutions define their project and fulfil their missions Thus they help to keep the public informed and first of all the institutions users and partners particularly the state and other funding actors The recommendations they include also make them a strategic tool which can be used by the institutions and in particular by the presidents and their teams to implement their policy to improve the quality of their teaching methods of their research and of their management the evaluation is based on a dialogue between the CNE and the evaluated institutions Criteria and indicators are defined and discussed both by the CNE and the CPU Conférence des présidents d université University Presidents Conference There s a dialogue based reflexion over the methodology of the evaluation and the guidelines used for the internal evaluation The report drafting itself is submitted for comment to the people in charge in the evaluated institution which president has the last word as his or her reply is published at the end of the evaluation report Organising and carrying out the evaluation of an institution The decision to undertake the evaluation of a higher education institution is made by the CNE members during a plenary meeting and upon its President s suggestion The evaluation is led by one two or three members of the CNE They are nominated by the President and may be assisted by a consultant One chargé de mission project manager responsible for an evaluation programme is then given the charge of the the programme by the general delegate Member s general delegate and chargé s de mission are the people in charge for the evaluation programme Two steps are necessary for the evaluation of an institution First an internal evaluation is led and organised by the institution That evaluation is helped by the guidelines for evaluation and must involve all the institution staff

    Original URL path: https://www.cne-evaluation.fr/versions/anglais.htm (2015-12-30)
    Open archived version from archive